Part 1
In a 24/7 news cycle, all we hear is noise, and as the world continues its staggered march towards Global Despotism, here’s a bilateral view on some of the last few years’ biggest news stories and disasters. With a little bit of speculation, a backpack of facts, and a whole lot of data to help you form your own opinion, buckle up and take this first of many short excursions to teach you how to truly uncork yourself.
Hey people, yeah, I know, I know, “He’s back, gosh darn it. Here we go again.” But anyway, if you were going to dismantle the world’s leading superpower, how would you do it? What would be the most rest-assured and closest thing to guaranteed success? Ummm, anyone? Come on, people, rub your heads together or at least a couple of nickels. No response yet? Well, ok, let me answer it for you. You’d conquer it from within, and a sure-shot way of doing that is an old but lesser-known war tactic: Asymmetric Warfare.
“In this day and age, many of the threats facing the United States and its allies can be categorized as asymmetric warfare: the clandestine infiltration by an enemy to do harm within a nation’s borders, causing the disruption of lives and the outlay of limited resources for protection. If these expenditures produce abundant hardships at many levels, they can become a force to end conflict. Against a superior foe, as modern history has shown, asymmetric warfare can be quite effective—but it is not a new approach.”1
Asymmetric Warfare, Early American Style, by Louis Arthur Norton
Okay, I’m going to make a short but fairly inclusive overview starting from August 2019 to the present that can help fill in any mental gaps that we may have.
Enemy from within, you say? Most certainly. Now, here are some examples that should make you wonder, “Hmm, you know what, Susan? He might be right.”
Summer 2019—The summer of love or “nationwide coordination” for violent protest. It’s almost like a type of color revolution…. Duh.
And hey, why not put it on the taxpayers’ dime to rebuild the cities you systematically destroyed, and while you’re at it, use a crooked legal system with heavily funded lawyers to pay the perpetrators and plant a narrative. Sounds legit…. maybe in the Soviet Union at the height of its reign. Well, you know, these are things to stride towards.
Okay, maybe that’s a coincidence, so there’s no way the next step would be even more monetary embezzlement—just to add to the never-ending secret tax, all in the name of perceived weaponized virtue. I mean, come on, what are we, children?
“For all the talk of inflation, you print $6.72 trillion in thirty months, what the hell did you think was going to happen?” O’Leary says. “Of course there’s going to be inflation.”2
Let’s not forget these same psychopathic elites decided many, many moons ago there are far too many of us, expressed in the Limits to Growth from the Club of Rome:
“Equilibrium would require trading certain human freedoms, such as producing unlimited numbers of children or consuming uncontrolled amounts of resources.”
The Limits to Growth (Meadows et al., 1972)
Click here to read Limits to Growth
Agenda 2030, anyone? (aka The Great Reset), WEF, the Fourth Industrial Revolution, Build Back Better, etc. Blah, blah, blah, look them up. It’s an I.Q test at this point. But anyway, the point is that they clearly aren’t interested in protecting the herd, just themselves, which could explain this insane excess death marker since 2021.
“The total excess deaths since the rollout of the vaccine in the U.S. is approximately 1.1 million for 2021, 2022 and 2023. We estimate the economic cost of productive working age people dying at $15.6 billion [and] estimate 28.4 million individuals are chronically absent, resulting in an estimated economic cost of $135 billion since 2021.”
That’s pretty serious, right? This is from a discussion in a Senate hearing with certified professionals. And, if you haven’t noticed, I’m presenting the evidence from as few state-run media sources as possible because they don’t have a say anymore. That goose is cooked. I mean, “Come on, man.”
See you in part 2.
by Ned Stark
Sources
Massachusetts First 
Leave a comment