While the United Nations & World Economic Forum repeatedly rebrand their communist agenda, hoping the world won’t notice
The Introduction
Since the early 1990s, city mayors worldwide have been taking orders from the UN and the WEF after the idea of a New World Order was first introduced by the late US President Herbert Walker Bush in a speech on September 11, 1990. But why would our elected government officials take orders from these unelected, globalist, non-government billionaires at the UN and WEF? What’s in it for the mayors? Are there brownie points involved?
As mentioned previously in Mayors Race To Zero, Klaus Schwab, the founder and executive director of the World Economic Forum, wrote:
“Every country, from the United States to China, must participate, and every industry, from oil and gas to tech, must be transformed. In short, we need a ‘Great Reset’ of capitalism.”
The Name Changes
The Great Reset became the buzzword for the New World Order. Then came Agenda 21, a reference to the 21st century,
“21 circular economy solutions: changing how we eat, live and travel for a more sustainable world.”
Then, they renamed it by throwing in the climate change crisis, and now it’s called Agenda 2030 and Agenda 2050. But at this very minute, most know it as a policy adopted by corporations worldwide called Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG). Tomorrow, it may be titled something completely different. No matter what it’s called, the goal is to be 50% net zero CO2 carbons by 2030 and 100% net zero by 2050.
One item mentioned in the Race To Zero plan is implementing the 15-minute city2. The concept is to have all necessary amenities within a short walk, bike ride, or public transportation from one’s home. Traffic filter devices will be installed, and rules will be enforced by automatic number plate recognition (ANPR) cameras. These filters will assist with reducing the number of gas combustion engines on the streets by identifying unauthorized vehicles and issuing a fine.
A perfect example of this brand of authoritarianism is in Oxfordshire County, England. They have a detailed website available to anyone who wants to understand more about the 15-minute city. 3 The FAQ section on the Oxford Council’s website explains more about how traffic filters work.4
The Massachusetts Connection
The cities of Beverly and Salem’s Resilient Together plan lists Vision Zero Boston as a technical resource.5
“Boston is a leader in the global Vision Zero initiative. The City of Boston is using technology to re-imagine its streets. On smart streets, we use technology — like cameras and sensors — to learn more about how people navigate and interact on and with the City’s streets.”’6
Beverly, Peabody, and Salem also have cameras installed in their densely populated areas. Check out your downtown to see if cameras have been installed.
Smart Growth is another item listed in the Race to Zero plan. Stay tuned for more details about how this ties into Smart Cities and everything digital. Including your money!
The evidence is right in front of us, which begs the question. Are our mayors setting us up for a communist lifestyle? Is there a mayor-to-be that would go against the grain and object to this Great Reset?
Beverly and Peabody registered voters, mark your calendar to vote on November 7th, 2023!
by Citizens for Truth Contributor
Sources
[1] https://massachusetts1st.net/2023/09/11/mayors-race-to-zero/
[2] https://unfccc.int/blog/the-15-minute-city
[4] https://www.oxfordmail.co.uk/news/23177152.oxfordshire-oxford-council-abused-traffic-filters/
[6] https://www.boston.gov/innovation-and-technology/smart-streets
Massachusetts First 
Leave a comment